Today's story about a Tasmanian teacher being imprisoned for 18 months for having a sexual relationship with a 16 year-old student has me wondering why after over 18 months of Judge Elkaim finding that Carenne Special School teacher Anna Blackburn had a sexual relationship with student David Withyman no charges have been laid.
Despite being an intellectually disabled 17 year-old at the time and there being laws in place prohibiting a sexual relationship between a teacher and person under the age of 18, there have been no criminal charges laid against Anna Blackburn.
It comes as no surprise that charges have not been laid, given that Bathurst Police have a history of covering up issues involving Carenne Special School. In 2003, Constable Erin Lloyd knew of the affair and did absolutely nothing about it. Events since have shown that Police in Bathurst will do anything to protect the school and its staff.
It's time that charges are laid against Anna Blackburn, a sex fiend who preyed on an intellectually disabled 17 year-old.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
118 comments:
EXACTLY!!!! Why is NEW SOUTH WALES refusing to uphold the laws of the land? Why does NEW SOUTH WALES refuse to report on criminal behaviour in it's schools? Why does NEW SOUTH WALES have a strangle hold on the press of this state? When will we see a ROYAL COMMISSION ENQUIRY into all of the child sexual abuse and criminal actions of McDiarmid and her Klans and Kabals in this Region? It is laughable that this state is behaving like a stupid ostrich sticking it's dumb head into the sand and hoping it'll all go away. Guess what? IT BLOODY WON'T!!!!
You are right. The issues are not confined to Carenne but the Western Region of DEC itself. Years ago, Mr Murphy was sacked from Bathurst High for molesting students, there is a pedophile ring at Kelso High, Natalie Cross at Kelso Public was known for inappropriate relationships with students and then there is the whole issue at Bathurst West.
You want to be ashamed of yourselves.
The reason Anna Blackburn was not charged was because there was no crime to charge Ms Blackburn with the first instance of sexual intercourse occurred when he was 18.
The first instance of sexual intercourse was found by the District Court to have occurred when Mr Whityman was 18.
The judge in the District Court made this following comment in regards to weather Ms Blackburn had committed a criminal offence
"He was also 18 years of age and there was then no possible criminal act or breach of duty being carried out by Ms Blackburn." see paragraph 446 of judgement
I would therefore be very careful Julie Brown before stating she has committed a crime as she may sue you for defamation or saying that she has sex with him with he was 17 as a court of law has found that not to be the case.
I call upon you to issue a retraction to this claim as a court of law has found it not to be true.
I note that Bathurst Police did investigate this thoroughly and went well out of its way calling in Child Sex Crimes Squad and sought an advice of the DPP.
Child grooming laws were not in force in 2003 they were brought in 2007 and child grooming offence only apply to people up to age 16.
Mr Whityman turned 18 in March 2003. In the District Court trial the judge at paragraph 377 of the judgement found that the sexual relations first occurred sometime in April 2003.
Ms Blackburn was interviewed and as I understand the situation she said it occurred when he was 18.
Mr Whityman also stated that he consented to having sex and this raised an issue as Mr Whityman if he was 18 he was capable of consenting to having sex as though he had a disability he was high functioning.
Therefore there was no crime Anna Blackburn could be charged with.
See Withyman v State of NSW & Anor (2010)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWDC/2010/186.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=%22Anna%20Blackburn%20%22
Be very careful as I will sue you for defamation the District Court in Mr Whityman's lawsuit stated that the sexual relations did not start until he was 18 therefore no crime was committed.
Obviously you can't read Mary because it said she began having sex with him prior to his 18th birthday however when they were found out in October he was 18.
I suggest you read it again. It was alleged that the sexual intercourse occurred in some time in March 2003.
While there may have been described as grooming behaviour while he was 17 that in NSW is not illegal .
The judge accepted the evidence of Ms Minato that the first time sexual intercourse occurred was
"377. The evidence of Ms Minato, I am satisfied, establishes that a sexual relationship existed between the plaintiff and Ms Blackburn, that it commenced some time before the end of April 2003 and continued until at least September 2003."
"379. My finding of a sexual relationship is a finding of sexual intercourse having occurred between the plaintiff and Ms Blackburn during the period I have mentioned above."
That puts it somewhere in April 2003 where the first sexual intercourse has been found to occur. He was 18 in April 2003.
"360. I have posed the question in a simple fashion but it also involves a temporal aspect, namely whether the relationship commenced while the plaintiff was a student at Carenne. This aspect also involves the plaintiff’s age. He turned 18 in March 2003"
I note that the plaintiff did argue some time in March however that would still not prove that there was sex when he was under 18 as he turned 18 in March it could have been before or after after his birthday.
However the judge preferred Ms Minato and found sexual intercourse occurred some time before the end of April.
Cut the rot Mary! I can tell you for a fact that the sexual relationship had actually started the year before when Anna was in the junior school. I don't care what the court says that is when it happened.
Terry Neal said that "at least it keeps him under control" by having sex with her. Carole McDiarmid said to not do anything about it.
The grooming of him would be an offence you imbecile Mary. I have just looked at it myself:
73 Sexual intercourse with child between 16 and 18 under special care
(1) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who:
(a) is under his or her special care, and
(b) is of or above the age of 16 years and under the age of 17 years,
is liable to imprisonment for 8 years.
(2) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who:
(a) is under his or her special care, and
(b) is of or above the age of 17 years and under the age of 18 years,
is liable to imprisonment for 4 years.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a person ( "the victim") is under the special care of another person ( "the offender") if, and only if:
(a) the offender is the step-parent, guardian or foster parent of the victim, or
(b) the offender is a school teacher and the victim is a pupil of the offender, or
(c) the offender has an established personal relationship with the victim in connection with the provision of religious, sporting, musical or other instruction to the victim, or
(d) the offender is a custodial officer of an institution of which the victim is an inmate, or
(e) the offender is a health professional and the victim is a patient of the health professional.
****(4) Any person who attempts to commit an offence under subsection (1) or (2) is liable to the penalty provided for the commission of the offence.****
(5) A person does not commit an offence under this section if the person and the other person to whom the charge relates were, at the time the offence is alleged to have been committed, married to each other.
Yes you used laugh about it too everyone didn't you Lee
How many of you dirty pedophile cunts at the school knew about it? How many of you cunts took part in it? How about that useless cunt Neil Moon answer this - how many students were removed from the school last year because they were sexually assaulted by another student, staff or unknown? Does three sound right fuckwit? How many other students were raped that can't speak up you pack of dirty sick fuckers.
Didn't you post on this blog you fat slut that it made it easier to handle him and that he was over 16 so it didn't matter?
How many students over the age of 16 did you fuck?
Did you ever report any abuse?
It's a shame they didn't DNA test the fetus that Blackburn aborted at the end of 2002. I bet the father would have been David Withyman. That's right, Anna Blackburn was PREGNANT to a disabled student.
Look at the list of staff that have been told to leave quietly for having sex with students:
Kaye Negus
Bev Warn
Lii Bagley
No action was ever taken against any of them. When Blackburn was at Carenne there was a pedophile ring consisting of Terry Neal, Negus, Warn and Blackburn.
I can tell you that all of us at the school in 2003 knew they were having sex. It was no secret. It was condoned by Jock, Lee and Terry.
You knew about it Lee. What did you do? You knew about him having intercourse with her in 2002 and earlier in that year with Bev Warn.
I don't believe Lee had sex with students but you might like to ask Barbara Woolfe about the relationships she developed with students at both Raglan and Carenne.
Only sexual intercourse would have been an offence under section 73 grooming is not a crime under section 73.
There was insufficient evidence to prove sexual intercourse happened while he was 17 as the victim did not know the specific date other than it happened some time close to my 18th birthday and consequently the sexual intercourse could happened either side when he was 18 or 17 therefore there was insufficient evidence to charge her as it could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt that it happened when he was 17.
While there was grooming that was not a crime as the grooming laws brought in 2007 and it only covered children up to 16 and that still does not prove sexual intercourse happened when he was 17 or younger
Anna Blackburn is entitled to the presumption of innocence. The judgement from the civil case only found that sexual intercourse occurred on the first occasion some time before the end of April 2003 when the student was 18.
I also not that Mr Whityman has previously indicated to Police that he does not want charges laid and consequently Mr Whityman wishes have to be respected and has said that he will not give evidence.
There also is very little evidence to prove that sexual intercourse occurred when he was 17 or younger. While there may be suspicion that is not evidence
Consequently there is nothing to charge Anna Blackburn with and while there may be suspicions of it occurring when he was 17 a court it could not be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that it occurred when he was 17 or younger
When does David Withyman appeal come up before the courts again Julie Brown?
The DET shipped Terry Neil off on a holiday because he couldn't lie good enough ,when grilled by David Withyman BARRISTERS.
Did you tell the ICAC this Lee Churches?
It always perplexes me how those in the teaching profession believe that they know much, but in reality know little. You are seriously benighted when it comes to the law.
The provision of statute, being section 73 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) applied only to a male teacher, father, step-father and a female student aged 16 or 17 prior to 13 June 2003.
Upon reading the district court judgment I can envisage that the teacher could have committed an offence under section 66F of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). That section provided the following at the time the offence/s were commissioned:
(1) In this section:
"intellectual disability" means an appreciably below average general intellectual function that results in the person requiring supervision or social habilitation in connection with daily life activities.
(2) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who:
(a) has an intellectual disability, and
(b) is (whether generally or at the time of the sexual intercourse only) under the authority of the person in connection with any facility or programme providing services to persons who have intellectual disabilities,
shall be liable to imprisonment for 10 years.
(3) Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person who has an intellectual disability, with the intention of taking advantage of the other person’s vulnerability to sexual exploitation, shall be liable to imprisonment for 8 years.
(4) Any person who attempts to commit an offence under this section upon another person who has an intellectual disability shall be liable to the penalty provided for the commission of the offence.
(5) A person does not commit an offence under this section unless the person knows that the person concerned has an intellectual disability.
(6) No prosecution for an offence against this section shall be commenced without the approval of the Attorney General.
As a person enrolled at a school for persons with special needs, Mr Withyman would satisfy the definition of a intellectually disabled person as this would provide evidence of having an "appreciably below average general intellectual function that results in the person requiring supervision or social habilitation in connection with daily life activities".
Due to Ms Blackburn being his teacher, Mr Withyman would be considered to be under the authority of Ms Blackburn whom is involved in "any facility or programme providing services to persons who have intellectual disabilities".
In order to prevent looking fatuous in the future I suggest that you stick to your professional undertaking and leave the interpretation of law to legal practitioners.
Marcus Jacobs QC
12th Floor Selborne/Wentworth Chambers
Please see my advice below, which is written in such a way so as to be easily understandable by a person of your intellect.
I believe that Mr Withyman's representatives did not act with due care and attention by not calling Mr Neal to take the stand. His unavailability should of had no bearing on who was or was not called to give evidence.
That's correct the lawyers for Mr Whityman wanted to call him at short notice however he was missing and and the Department claimed they could not locate him.
There was a warrent out for his arrest so he could be taken to court by force but Bathurst Police could not be bothered to enforce it or track him down to drag him off to court.
The Department settled out of court with Mr Whityman.
The reason charges have not been laid is that Mr Whityman is refusing to lay charges as his sister Mauricia Withyman is a teacher at Bathurst High and there has been intimidation by namely Geoff Hastings Principal of Bathurst High who is a good friend with Terry Neal that if charges are laid that they will try and get rid of her
Surely the DET are not that bloody stupid,bringing more attention too their corrupt ways?
Is this CORRECT Julie Brown?
Complete lies
Which one are you today Larry the lama Michael Auld or Mary Housler ?
MARY HOUSLER using Larry the lama as a ALIAS!
I am Larry the Lama. I am not Michael Auld or Mary Housler
You are MARY HOUSLER
Thought you all might want to know that the ICAC investigation is progressing.
The ICAC has held what it calls compulsory examinations which are held in private of a number of Carenne School employees in which people can be forced to answer questions however there answers can not be used against them in disciplinary, criminal or civil proceedings.
It looks as though a public hearing will be called and it is looking like it will be set down for a hearing in Bathurst in August which is estimated to go for four months
Look if anyone has issues with the Carenne Support I suggest you become a member and then you can vote Carenne Support board out of office if you feel that way.
However you have chosen not to do that as you are lazy people and consquently Carenne Support at present has the complete confidence of its members.
You all seem to like to criticse the way Carenne Support than I put a challenge to you to vote out the board and become a board member.
You will then see how hard it is and stop criticsing Carenne Support.
You seem to claim a number of people believe in your views about Carenne Support yet you will not take action to remove the board.
Membership is open to all and you could easily get the numbers and throw out of office and I challenge you to do that then you will see how much Carenne Support contributes to Carenne.
Any ICAC inqury will compelty exonorate Carenne
This is absolute garbage Geoff Hastings is a highly respected principal. He would not involve himself in intimidation.
I understand they tried to track him down but he was oversees and he blantly refused to come back and was difficult to serve a subpoena oversees on him and the judge refused a request for an adjornment until he came back from holidays.
Carenne Support has the full confidence of the parents of Carenne.
ALIASES Carenne Parent and Mary H are Mary Housler.
What and become a crook and be part of fraud of stealing BUSES Mary Housler?
BULLSHIT Mary Housler.
Is this you Mary Housler using Boomer "Christine Porter "ALIAS"?
Wrong again Mary Housler he was in the northern territory.
Well if you believe that is going on stand for election as a board member and you can take over the running of Careene Support yourself since all you want to do is complain. You would have no idea at all about running Carenne Support.
I am not using any alias and I did not make those comments.
There was a warrent issued for his arrest under section 194 so he could be dragged before the court but the police namely Bathurst Police who were supposed to execute it and make the necessary arrangements with NT police could not be bothered because it was a civil matter and they did not take the necessary steps to arrange him to be arrested in the Northern territory and have him brought back to NSW to give evidence.
The problem is that when he was 18 and started having sex with Anna Blackburn he was living with her as de facto partner
bullshit
you know lee churches
bulshit
The board is never elected by the members. I can tell you as someone who used to be involved in Carenne Support. The election process is rigged. The board is appointed, how do you think Catherine Bird became a member?
Why are there parents looking at suing it? Next you will say Interchange has the full support of parents, even though one is suing them too.
That only would occur if there is no nomination or there is a casual vacancy Catherine Bird was elected unopposed.
Cheryl Chaplin is in huge trouble the extent of her fraud amounts to over $40,000 of overcharging of the Department. The Department also intends to sue her as well.
Carenne School have protected any more funds going to Cheryl's scam and I understand she is also suspected of being involved in Interchange's financial problems as well.
Carenne School should be commended for detecting this fraud Cheryl and she was brought in for questioning today at Bathurst Police and charges are highly likely.
I understand that Helen Windsor and Neal Moon are going to be the star wittiness at the trial if she pleads not guilty.
I understand Carenne School's office staff are going to be receiving a commendation from the director general for discovering this.
Congratulations Carenne School for taking action against this con artist.
Further fraud was detected on Friday involving Cheryl Chaplin when she falsely claimed to have a TSO on the vehicle when someone else was on there. This was pretty stupid because Neil Moon had already told her she was under investigation.
The audit office of the department has been called in to investigate Cheryl Chaplin who is believed to of over claimed for the past 5 years. A specially equipped vehicle did her route today as it was last year before following Chaplin on her afternoon run and it is believed she is overclaiming 30 Km/day.
That's exactly what ALL DET/DEC "elections" are - RIGGED/CROOKED/CORRUPT, jobs for the boys, NEPOTISM, INCESTUOUS CRONYISM run amok. Mcdairymaid taught them all about this and continues making sure it thrives. One of her special gal-pals is getting her retirement medal so Mcdairymaid is travelling at tax payers expense down to Bathurst to give it to her in person at a special ceremony. Meanwhile two other employees who retired two years ago still DON'T have their medals and they certainly WON'T be having them handed to them by Mcdairymaid IN PERSON!!!!! What a sick sick sick region this one is. Well done DET/DEC, you permit all of this, turn a blind eye, sweep complaints and reports under the rug, and REWARD CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR aka Mcdonald who was GIVEN Orange Public School as reward for destroying at least six people's lives and careers!!!! Nazis the bloody lot of them.
AND . . . just where is the ubiquitous Toni Mcdonald? Why isn't she at work? Has she too taken her vacation early to avoid paying the 'normal' school vacation levy? What a bloody rort these bludgers engage in.
Bloody Nazis, typical WEstern region nepotism and incestuous cronyism. Anyone who is an individual, mature human being is destroyed. These insecure, immature, rotten to the core people MUST BE GOT RID OF before schools will once more begin being places of education for students. ROYAL COMMISSION ENQUIRY NOW.
BULLSHIT! What would you know you sicko wannabe! You know nothing, you ARE nothing.
Oh yes they are. Don't forget that the DET/DEC is made up of absolute sociopaths - people who believe they are god! They think they are untouchable and invincible. Just take a look back through history and you'll see the same attitudes and behaviours among the 'so called' leaders of society and how terribly they came unstuck. The DET/DEC is coming unstuck even as I type this and nothing will stop it happening. Truth will out. Justice will prevail.
I'll be in contact with you soon. Great to see an educated, knowledgeable person writing and trying to shut up these stupid ignorant women who blather on here!
ALL abuse has been reported and those who did so sacked by DET/DEC!!! Enough???
Shanice is another KLAN MEMBER spreading their BULLSHIT
This have be the Not so famous klan member LEE CHURCHES would it not Liberty Rowan?
Is Catherine Bird still a board member Mary Housler?
Believe me NO it won't MARY HOUSLER.
The sooner the Better for the special children sake.
Very True Liberty Rowan.
Is she still a member?
Believe me Whitebeard they HAVN"T.
Boomer are you Christine Porter or Mary Housler at Yesterday 03:34 PM post
The Audit Office of the department want to investigate Carenne Support Limited they do the same thing overclaim Km/day
Can i earn big dollars like the other board members if i become a board member Mary Housler?
This is why Carenne Support Limited are getting sued Mary Housler by parents.
It's Time
MARY HOUSLER using Larry the lama as a ALIAS!
* A Like
* Reply
* Yesterday 11:30 AM
* in reply to Larry the lama
* 1 Like
Mary H
I am not using any alias and I did not make those comments.
* A Like
* Reply
* Yesterday 05:28 PM
* in reply to It's Time
Mary Housler once again confirmed she is Mary H by answering It's Time post.
No that does not prove anything
She is on leave that she is legally entitled to take she has a right to take leave when ever it suits her.
I would like to inform people that Michael Auld was today cleared of any wrongdoing by an EPAC investigation.
As reported on this blog by Libertarian in February "Auld under investigation". The claims that Libetarian have been found to without foundation and that they were false.
Mr Auld has been cleared of any misconduct and the allegations against him were deemed by Ms Thorpe of EPAC to be without foundation and the allegations were found to be vexatious, frivolous and malicious.
As a friend of Mr Auld I call upon Libertarian to apolgise for the claims she has made.
An investigation in to Cheryl Chaplin has discovered a major fraud involving Cheryl Chaplin.
Cheryl has been involved in scamming the Department for years and it was not dedicated for years by Carenne School office staff who should have not signed off on some of the ridiculous claims made by Cheryl Chaplin.
I understand that all Carenne School office staff in particular Simone Russell and Helen Windsor are going to be under investigation for signing off on these claims as well as Neal Moon.
Neal Moon and the office staff are blaming one another for the claims being signed off on and saying Assisted Travel Unit is the one who is responsible.
The investigation has taken several months as private investigators and Bathurst detectives have had to conduct a cover operation following Cheryl run to see if she is over charging.
Also Capebase is under investigation for fraud as well by the Department and has also been referred to police.
I understand the Department's investigation into Capebase and Cheryl Chaplin has been suspended being pending the outcome of the Police investigation however monitoring by the department's private investigators will still continue.
It is understood the cost of the private investigators has hit close to $60,000 to follow the runs.
The Department has also stated that it will not be allowing any Carenne School employees to be employed as driver's or escorts on any runs to until its investigation is completed as it considers there to be a conflict of interest with department employees being drivers or escorts.
I under that the Department intends to implement a state wide ban on the practice of department employees being employed by Assisted travel contractors as driver's or escorts as it considers it is a conflict of interest and the ICAC is questioning the practice.
The investigation has been suspended pending a police investigation by Bathurst Detectives.
Carenne Support board members do not get paid they are volunteers.
If the director is an employee or contractor of Carenne Support they can be paid only for work which does not relate to them being a director and the amount they are paid must be an award rate or market value for the services rendered.
Carenne Support directors can seek reimbursement for approved expenses they have incurred such as travel in connection with attending to duties as a director at a per km rate or for purchasing something for Carenne Support.
These expenses have to be approved by the board, properly verified and they are on only reimbursements for out of pocket expense in connection with Carenne Support.
Using one of Lee Churches ALIAS Mary Housler to spread your BULLSHIT.
More BULLSHIT from Mary Housler.
Oh don't woryy Mary Housler it will be proven.
Why don't you just piss off Mary Housler with your BULLSHIT.
More Bullshit Mary Housler.
You are a BLOODY LIAR Mary Housler.
Hey you not game too lie about the above post Mary Housler?
Well it wasn't me that posted the rot.
No Catherine resigned
You are a liar Mary, she was appointed by the board as an additional member. There was no election to elect her from.
Stop the censorship Julie Brown and SEA snitch. People who disagree with your views should be allowed there opportuinty to put there views across so I request that you stop delating the comments.
An election was held however no one stood at all and she was appionted to the postion by the board as a result of no one standing when nominations were sought.
I request that you post under one username and stop trying to hijack the debate using multiple usernames. You have also been impersonating other users such as Seymour, Blog of Lies and Larry the Llama and that is just this week!
I can understand that you are frustrated by the Bathurst community's view of Carenne Special School and Carenne Support, when I was there two weeks ago most of the people I spoke to had absolutely nothing nice to say about it.
Did she see what CROOKS you all were Lee Churches?
More LiES Mary Housler
It's Time
Using one of Lee Churches ALIAS Mary Housler to spread your BULLSHIT.
* A Like
* Reply
* Yesterday 07:59 AM
* in reply to
Carennetruth
Well it wasn't me that posted the rot.
* A Like
* Reply
* Yesterday 04:43 PM
* in reply to It's Time
lee churches just admitted she uses seymour and carennetruth
I suggest you speak to a broad range of people beyond your disgruntled ex employees who are ex employees for good reason and vexatious complainants.
More lies out of your mouth Ros Luther,They are not vexatious complainants and it will be proven a PROMISE.
she was not charged as there was no evidence to support his claims. as for the post further on calling me a paedaphine and wa asked to leave????? i was medically retired after botched up surgery put me in hospital for months. TRUTH, YOU WANT THE TRUTH yes there was a cover up, a cover up that this student had sexually assaulted me, i went straight to the principa; and was told pretty much to get over it. This poor disabled child you keep referring tohad a mild intellectual disability, huge behavioural problems and a sexual preditor that should never have been at that school,
facts straight, I never worked there whileterry or anna did -- error number one. number two I was his other victim. I had been a teacher of his and he sexually assaulted me, there is your cover up!!!! that a sexual predetor assaulted his teacher, the teacher reported to the principal and it was all hushed up, I got no support at all and had to continue on to teach him like nothinng had happened. Why did I leave???? certainly not sacked, had a hysterectomy that lead to them having to remove my bladder, 12 months on sick leave, I got depression and medically retired . sexual assaults happen on teachers much mroe thatn you think, did anna touch him???? i very much doubt it, if anything it would have been the toher way around. the other teachers here you have defamed, I will be [assing this blog onto them and we will start a law suite agains the writer of this ill informed pathetic posting. this poor disabled child as he has been refferred to had a very mild intellectual disability, was refused entry to carenne at first as did not qualify, enrolled due to behaviour problems, a highly hormonal, fantasing teenager who has destroyed a lot of peoples lives, and npow we find this on the internet
how many teachers at this school and were sexually assaluted and physically assaulted??? thats right get the facts out there for a change, I guess a teacher being sexually assaulted by a student isnt as juicy gossip>>> this student left two vitcims in his path, anna was a victim of a sexually horminal teenage boyof nearly 18, who had a very mild intellectual disability, she was the victim of his fantasy and I the victim of one os his sexual assaults - there is your cover up, I went to the principal in tears and told him this student had sexually assaulted me, i was told to get on with it pretty much. his disablity was so mild he was refused entry at first, it was his behaviour problems that got him there.
ALL OF THE TEACHERS AT THIS SCHOOL THAT YOU ARE ACCUSING OF BEING PAEDOPHILES WERE DEDICATED AND CARING PROFESSIONALS - ALL INCLUDING ANNA. We will tracj down the defaming writers in this blog and start a class action lawsuit
what is odd is that his lawyers did not call me!! despite ,my assault being discussed in court and the princlpal questionned re me reporting it to him, when the principal was cross examined he was aksed did he rmember me reporting the sexual assault to him in 2000, he remark was that it could have happened he didnt recall, I m pretty sure you would remrmber something like that!!! he didnt want to lie under oath and deny it, safer to say dont recall but might have. this was before anna even worked there!!!! they didnt call me as it would ruin their case entirely. when you know the facts of the case I guess no real interest as not as juicy!" this child" of 17 that you refer to, sexaully assailted me at the school and was reported to principal. this was before poor unsuspecting anna started there
well leave me out of your gossip, I went off on sick leave IN August 2000 due to a horrendous , surgical blunder and was retired MEDICALLY in 2002 after being on nearly 2 years of sick leave!! I had a permanent bladder catheter in so belive me was having no sex with anyone . THIS IS DISGUSTING DEFAMATION . i HAD WELL AND TRULY LEFT mid 2000 some two years before anna and I believe terry started, as far as I know, in 2003. and was never there when either anna or terry. so unless you all want to face lawsuits, get the facts. I CAN TELL YOU NOW THAT TYPE OF BEHAVIOUR WAS NEVER CONDONED AND WOULD HAVE BEEN INSTANT DISMISSAL. You are tryiing, for whatever motive of your own, to destroy some extremely dedicated and caring teachers NOT ON.
I am not too scared, like all of you seem to be, to put a name to my comments
lets not get complicated, the charges were not laid becuase they were false. 17 year old hormonal boy that loved to fantasizem problem is this esalated the older her got, ending in me being sexually assaulted on the playground by him and him bashing anna when she refused to fulfill his hormonal bullshit - NO GHARGES AS CANT HAVE EVIDENCE WHEN A BLATANT LIE.
every single teacher you have lied about in these posts IS HIGHLY DEDICATED and professional. WHAT A LOAD OF ROT. better eatch we dont band together and sue your asses for gross defemation. i notice none of you, except me it seems, is disgust3ed enough or honest enough, to use your real noame!
awesome, someone who can see the this rot for what it is
funny that you say that when I went on sickleave in Agust 2000 due to a horrific surgical error and was retired AFTER TWO YEARS of sick leave. how did I do it with him earlier i the year when I left two years before anna started AND had a permanent catheter hanging out down there!!!!!! sex what a joke
its pretty obvious now, to anyone with a brain, that you are accusing 6 or even more (in other posts) professional teachers at the one school. during that time frame that is EVERY member of staff that either "did it" or covered it up. there were only 6 teachers at the school!!!!!! oh what a joke this is. dont know why I got so upset when really its bovious bull to anyuone with a brain.
you might get a bit more of the truth by going to this page!!!1
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/inquiry-told-pupil-groped-teacher/2008/11/27/1227491735585.html
maybe read this and get the facts. he was not a victim, he made victims, should never have even been at that
school.no other school would have him due to his violence and behaviour!!!
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/inquiry-told-pupil-groped-teacher/2008/11/27/1227491735585.html
GO FOR IT!!! SOMEONE ON HERE WITH A BRAIN LOL IN THIS BLOG EVERY SINGLE TEACHER THAT WORKED AT CARENNE IN 200 TO 2003 HAS BEEN NAMED AS A PEDOPHILE IN ONE POSTING OR ANOTHER, THAT IN ITSELF, SEEING AS ONLY SIX TEACHERS AT THE SCHOOL THEN , SHOWS ITS BULLSHIT. SEEMS TO ME SOMEONE HAS A GRUDGE AGAINST TEACHERS, AS YOU DONT MENTION ONE AID (AND THERE WERE 5) AS DOING ANYTHING TO THE KIDS. WIERD IN ITSELF AS THEY WOULD BE THE OBVIOUS TARGETS OF THIS BULLSHIT AS THEY DID ALL THE CHANGING AND TOILETING!!!
ABOSLUTE EVIL TO TRY AND DEFAME GOOD PEOPLE LIKE THIS WITH THE SICKEST OF ALL ALLEGATIONS POSSSIBLE,,,,,, SHAME ON YOU ALL
hey stranger! how is things, pretty silly question I guess. Dont worry, only an idiot would believe all this nonsense. Lost a good teacher when you retired! dont worry about this lot cause everyone who knows you knows its a sick joke
sounds like a very disgruntled member of staff??? so you were there in 2003, could it be that you are Juliette? she was an unhappy camper that always bitched about staff behind their backs? she doesnt seem to get mentionned anywhere in all these blogs, ywet it seems all other staftt, teachers and aides are, very odd
Post a Comment